Marc Pickren, CEO, Springbot, Inc.
Listen up, marketers. If you’re still churning out snooze-fest ads that could double as sleep aids, it’s time for a wake-up call. A groundbreaking study by System1, featuring insights from industry heavyweights like Adam Morgan and Peter Field, has laid it bare: dull ads are draining your coffers.
According to the research, brands need to shell out 2.6 times more on media spend for lackluster ads to achieve the same market share growth as their more engaging counterparts. When it comes to profit growth, that figure is still a staggering 2 times more. In simple terms, playing it safe with your creative is like setting your budget on fire.
System1’s extensive testing reveals that a whopping 50% of U.S. ads elicit a neutral response—viewers feel nothing. In the realm of B2B advertising, it’s even bleaker, with 53% to 54% of ads falling into the neutral zone. This emotional void means your message isn’t just forgettable; it’s a financial black hole.
On the flip side, ads that stir emotions—be it joy, surprise, or even a touch of sadness—are the ones that stick. These “fame ads” generate 6.1 times more share growth than their dull, rational counterparts. Emotional engagement isn’t just a feel-good metric; it’s a proven driver of business results.
The evidence is irrefutable: boring ads are a luxury you can’t afford. Injecting creativity, emotion, and a dash of daring into your campaigns isn’t just a creative choice—it’s a fiscal imperative. So, next time you’re tempted to play it safe, remember: in the world of advertising, fortune favors the bold.
For a deeper dive into this study, check out the full article on Westwood One.